Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robin Strachan's avatar

I have been concerned about AI since the early 90s when a particularly brilliant philosophy teacher raised the red flag about intellectual integrity in writing, dangers of pirating, etc. I am one person, so what I think won't matter in the larger scale. On principle, I don't use AI to assist me in writing. That way, I can say without hesitation to my publisher that this is MY work.

Expand full comment
Jen Mierisch's avatar

I think these parts are key: "Ultimately, I spent as much time reading and editing the Copilot copy as I would have writing the article by myself" and also "I did not enjoy writing it." If it doesn't save time and it's not fun, then where's the advantage? Also, many writers have reported on the inaccuracy of ChatGPT's "research." It invents quotations that people never said, and cites real sources that if you didn't take time to look at the primary source you'd never know that ChatGPT's "fact" was made up. Here's just one example from a lawyer, there are many more: https://youtube.com/shorts/60WVb1HLy8Y?si=P8SMg3KIm2IJixBe

I work at a corporation and we use Gen AI tools occasionally. Invariably, they spit out the most generic, glossy, soulless copy you've ever read in your life. Sadly, for many corporate applications, that style might be the goal. But I'd never use it for any writing that I wanted to sound like my own creative work with my own voice and personality.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts